Précis of Heidegger, Language, and World-disclosure
نویسنده
چکیده
The book is a critical discussion of the conception of language as worlddisclosure that Heidegger develops explicitly in his writings after the Kehre, but that has its roots in Being and Time. According to this view, our access to the world, and to anything that might show up within the world, is structured by language. This view of language allows Heidegger to criticize the mentalism characteristic of modern philosophy and to articulate his new, hermeneutic approach. It lends plausibility to his contention that our primary access to the world is not due to an allegedly neutral perception of entities but to our prior understanding of everything that can show up within the world as something or other. Thus, the priority of understanding and interpretation over perception requires a hermeneutic transformation of philosophy. While Heidegger’s criticism of the subject–object model so characteristic of modern philosophy is certainly plausible, his view of the role that language plays in our experience of the world leads to counterintuitive consequences. The most notorious of them can be found in Heidegger’s writings on language after the Kehre, when he provocatively claims that ‘there is no thing when the word is lacking’ or that ‘language speaks’ and thus is ‘the master of man’. It is in view of these claims that the charges of linguistic idealism and of a rei cation of language are a commonplace among many interpreters of Heidegger’s later works. Less common, however, seems to be the urge to transform this charge into an explicit analysis and criticism of the premise that underlies Heidegger’s linguistic idealism, namely, his claim that our experience with entities is determined by our prior understanding of their being (1). But if this claim is right, along with the claim that our understanding of the being of entities is contained in our language (2), it is less than clear that Heidegger’s idealism, in spite of its counterintuitiveness, is actually wrong. In light of this
منابع مشابه
Reading Sohrab Sepehri\'s Poetry in Light of Heidegger’s Ontology
As one of the most famous philosophers of the twentieth century, Heidegger has proposed significant ideas about ontology. The undercurrent of his philosophy is the question of being in the world or Dasein. He believes that human is the only creature for whom being in the world is a question and only human is capable of asking about Dasein. Heidegger thinks that authentic poets with their partic...
متن کاملTHIS IS A DRAFT VERSION – PLEASE DON’T QUOTE OR CIRCULATE WITHOUT PERMISSION Wittgenstein reads Heidegger, Heidegger reads Wittgenstein: Thinking Language Bounding World
This is a tale of two readings, and of a non-encounter, the missed encounter between two philosophers whose legacy, as has been noted, might jointly define the scope of problems and questions left open, in the wake of the twentieth century, for philosophy today. In particular, I will discuss today two remarks, one by Wittgenstein on Heidegger, and the other by Heidegger on Wittgenstein; as far ...
متن کاملPhilosophy and The Human Inheritance in a Post-Western World
The dissolution of the Western-dominated Postwar Order, and the Eurocentric myths that sustain it, presents a unique opportunity to ponder an old question posed by every new generation: How can philosophy, which Islamic and ancient Greek learning traditions have long defined as the pursuit of “wisdom,” resume its millennial civilizing role? This paper looks beyond passing political events to re...
متن کاملRethinking the Heidegger-Deep Ecology Relationship
Recent disclosures regarding the relationship between Heidegger’s thought and his own version of National Socialism have led me to rethink my earlier efforts to portray Heidegger as a forerunner of deep ecology. His political problems have provided ammunition for critics, such as Murray Bookchin, who regard deep ecology as a reactionary movement. In this essay, I argue that, despite some simila...
متن کاملHeidegger, Mood and the Lived Body: The Ontical and the Ontological
It is sometimes said that Heidegger neglected the ontological significance of the lived body until the Zollikon Seminars, where he elaborates on the bodily aspect of Being-inthe-world as a “bodying forth.” Against such a contention, in this article I argue that, because of the central role that Heidegger grants to mood (disclosive affectivity) as a primordial way of disclosing Being-in-the-worl...
متن کامل